榛子发qq信息说：我喜欢你。
看到这个信息，我莫明其妙。故意问了句：你是谁？
榛子研究生都毕业了。工作都快一年了。跟我比起来是另一个世界的人了。
我知道他不喜欢我。
真的搞不懂男人为什么有自己喜欢的人追不到就拿另一个来填补呢？
其实对我很不公平啊。
可他说他喜欢我，说和我在一起自由自在，但和她在一起时就老担惊受怕。
担惊受怕说明你在意他啊！
为什么这样对我呢？
我算什么？
Friday, March 16, 2007
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
worth remembering
The story is about a man named Eddie and it begins at the end, with Eddie dying in the sun. It might seem strange to start a story with an ending. But all ending are also beginnings. We just don't know it at the time.
No story sits by itself. Sometimes stories meet at corners and sometimes they cover one another completely, like stones beneath a river.
Out on the Ocean, diamonds of sunlight danced on the water, and Eddie stared at their nimble movement.
No story sits by itself. Sometimes stories meet at corners and sometimes they cover one another completely, like stones beneath a river.
Out on the Ocean, diamonds of sunlight danced on the water, and Eddie stared at their nimble movement.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Microsoft first - then Google wants world domination
---from http://news.google.com/
Microsoft first - then Google wants world domination
John Naughton
Sunday February 25, 2007
The Observer
Psst ... want a $64 trillion question? Well, here it is: what is Google up to? I don't mean what is it doing in public; I mean what is the company really up to?The simple-minded answer is that it's going after Microsoft. After all, this week Google announced that it was bundling its 'data in the cloud' applications (email, instant messaging, calendar, word processing, spreadsheets) in a commercial package called 'Google Apps Premier Edition', which will sell for $50 per annum and comes with 10GB of storage per user, application programming interfaces to enable data migration, technical support and a guarantee of 99.9 per cent availability. It's basically an online Office suite and is targeted at small businesses, schools, universities, clubs and social groups.
Google executives went to great pains to pooh-pooh the idea that they were targeting Microsoft Office. 'We are not in this to get Microsoft,' said Dave Girouard, general manager of Google's business software division. 'We are in this to offer more compelling choices for consumers and businesses.' Quite so. And it may well be that for some organisations, the prospect of being able effectively to outsource their office IT operations for $50 per employee per year may be attractive - especially when they realise that to get the Google services they don't need to pay for Windows licences either: all they need is Firefox running on Linux - both free programmes.Recently, a Merrill Lynch analyst estimated that Microsoft Office cost companies $60 to $120 annually per user, assuming the software is used over a two- to three-year cycle. And that doesn't include the cost of the operating system or of the level of technical support needed to run a Microsoft-based network. It's been reported that Google already has more than 100,000 small businesses using Google Apps and that 'hundreds' of universities have allegedly signed up for the education version of the package.
On the other hand, Office has more than 450 million users worldwide, and we know from experience that the pace of transition from one computing paradigm to another can be glacial. So I can't see many people in Microsoft's Seattle HQ getting too worked up about the latest Google move, however many waves it causes in media circles.
As it happens, I suspect that Google's canny onslaught on Microsoft is just a diversionary sideshow. Something much bigger is afoot. It's about bandwidth, infrastructure and - ultimately - effective control of the net.
Here are two clues. First, Google is currentlya very profitable company. It has money to burn, and it's been burning it in some interesting ways. Chief among them is the purchase of colossal amounts of network bandwidth - the fibre-optic cabling that forms the backbone of the net.
PBS columnist Robert Cringely reports a recent conversation in which a bandwidth broker - someone who buys and sells bandwidth on fibre-optic networks around the world - told him that Google now controlled more network fibre than any other organisation on the planet.
Second, Google has been building large numbers of data centres - 'server farms' with tens of thousands of computers in each - and locating them all over the US and elsewhere in the world. The company is very secretive about this for reasons of security, which is fair enough. But people have begun to notice that some of these distributed data centres are situated near electrical power-generation plants.
So we have two curious facts: Google has acquired fabulous amounts of bandwidth capacity, for which it has no obvious use; and it's putting local data centres all over the place. Why would it be doing this? What's the factor that links these two observations?
The answer is simple: video. You may have noticed in the last six months how YouTube has transformed computers into a natural platform for watching video. And this is just the beginning. We're moving towards a world in which a significant amount of television programming will be delivered via the internet. Indeed, you could say that we're almost there already: it's been estimated, for example, that half of all internet traffic is now generated by BitTorrent, a file-sharing application that is being used mainly to transfer video files (many of them illicit) over the network.
But BitTorrent is a minority sport. Most people have never heard of it. What will happen, however, when getting hold of video via the net becomes a mainstream activity?
The answer is that the network, in its current form, won't be able to cope. And that's before high-definition television - which is even more of a bandwidth hog - becomes commonplace. The obvious solution to the problem would be to have an infrastructure that consisted of tens of thousands of localised data centres (which could cache video content), linked by high-speed fibre-optic channels.
Any company which had built such an infrastructure could effectively dictate its own terms, because only it could deliver what consumers had learned to crave. Such a company would, in effect, control the world.
If that comes about, we will have been well and truly Googled.
Microsoft first - then Google wants world domination
John Naughton
Sunday February 25, 2007
The Observer
Psst ... want a $64 trillion question? Well, here it is: what is Google up to? I don't mean what is it doing in public; I mean what is the company really up to?The simple-minded answer is that it's going after Microsoft. After all, this week Google announced that it was bundling its 'data in the cloud' applications (email, instant messaging, calendar, word processing, spreadsheets) in a commercial package called 'Google Apps Premier Edition', which will sell for $50 per annum and comes with 10GB of storage per user, application programming interfaces to enable data migration, technical support and a guarantee of 99.9 per cent availability. It's basically an online Office suite and is targeted at small businesses, schools, universities, clubs and social groups.
Google executives went to great pains to pooh-pooh the idea that they were targeting Microsoft Office. 'We are not in this to get Microsoft,' said Dave Girouard, general manager of Google's business software division. 'We are in this to offer more compelling choices for consumers and businesses.' Quite so. And it may well be that for some organisations, the prospect of being able effectively to outsource their office IT operations for $50 per employee per year may be attractive - especially when they realise that to get the Google services they don't need to pay for Windows licences either: all they need is Firefox running on Linux - both free programmes.Recently, a Merrill Lynch analyst estimated that Microsoft Office cost companies $60 to $120 annually per user, assuming the software is used over a two- to three-year cycle. And that doesn't include the cost of the operating system or of the level of technical support needed to run a Microsoft-based network. It's been reported that Google already has more than 100,000 small businesses using Google Apps and that 'hundreds' of universities have allegedly signed up for the education version of the package.
On the other hand, Office has more than 450 million users worldwide, and we know from experience that the pace of transition from one computing paradigm to another can be glacial. So I can't see many people in Microsoft's Seattle HQ getting too worked up about the latest Google move, however many waves it causes in media circles.
As it happens, I suspect that Google's canny onslaught on Microsoft is just a diversionary sideshow. Something much bigger is afoot. It's about bandwidth, infrastructure and - ultimately - effective control of the net.
Here are two clues. First, Google is currentlya very profitable company. It has money to burn, and it's been burning it in some interesting ways. Chief among them is the purchase of colossal amounts of network bandwidth - the fibre-optic cabling that forms the backbone of the net.
PBS columnist Robert Cringely reports a recent conversation in which a bandwidth broker - someone who buys and sells bandwidth on fibre-optic networks around the world - told him that Google now controlled more network fibre than any other organisation on the planet.
Second, Google has been building large numbers of data centres - 'server farms' with tens of thousands of computers in each - and locating them all over the US and elsewhere in the world. The company is very secretive about this for reasons of security, which is fair enough. But people have begun to notice that some of these distributed data centres are situated near electrical power-generation plants.
So we have two curious facts: Google has acquired fabulous amounts of bandwidth capacity, for which it has no obvious use; and it's putting local data centres all over the place. Why would it be doing this? What's the factor that links these two observations?
The answer is simple: video. You may have noticed in the last six months how YouTube has transformed computers into a natural platform for watching video. And this is just the beginning. We're moving towards a world in which a significant amount of television programming will be delivered via the internet. Indeed, you could say that we're almost there already: it's been estimated, for example, that half of all internet traffic is now generated by BitTorrent, a file-sharing application that is being used mainly to transfer video files (many of them illicit) over the network.
But BitTorrent is a minority sport. Most people have never heard of it. What will happen, however, when getting hold of video via the net becomes a mainstream activity?
The answer is that the network, in its current form, won't be able to cope. And that's before high-definition television - which is even more of a bandwidth hog - becomes commonplace. The obvious solution to the problem would be to have an infrastructure that consisted of tens of thousands of localised data centres (which could cache video content), linked by high-speed fibre-optic channels.
Any company which had built such an infrastructure could effectively dictate its own terms, because only it could deliver what consumers had learned to crave. Such a company would, in effect, control the world.
If that comes about, we will have been well and truly Googled.
Saturday, February 24, 2007
how do we feel about our lives?
Recently I have read a book THE FIVE PEOPLE YOU MEET IN HEAVEN.
everyone has to die oneday.
maybe it is not the time. don't be too anxious about it. But when it comes, don't hesitate, it doesn't means nothing. it means a new life without cheat. a new life passes quietly, a new life that cannot feel time.
all we need to think is DID YOU HAVE PASSION?
If something is wrong, just let it go. don't regret too much.
I love the sentence on the first page: YOU MADE ME LOVE YOU.
LOVE is the most beautiful word in the world.
everyone has to die oneday.
maybe it is not the time. don't be too anxious about it. But when it comes, don't hesitate, it doesn't means nothing. it means a new life without cheat. a new life passes quietly, a new life that cannot feel time.
all we need to think is DID YOU HAVE PASSION?
If something is wrong, just let it go. don't regret too much.
I love the sentence on the first page: YOU MADE ME LOVE YOU.
LOVE is the most beautiful word in the world.
Saturday, February 10, 2007
Spring Festival
Spring Festival is near, we are busy in preparing for the food, banger and other stuff.
Sometimes I found Spring festival is so boring, just relatives and friends gather together, eating and drinking, then , nothing else!
OMG! My poor english!
I find it hard to continue my blog!
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
my new bloggie!!!
I am so happy that I have a new bloggie!
I wanna this my little blog to be all written in English~
:D
I wanna this my little blog to be all written in English~
:D
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
